The following was written by guest author, friend, and brother in law Christopher Culbreath. I thank him for an excellent and thorough essay.
· · ·
I love Apple products. People who know me, know this. I got an Apple logo tattoo when I was 18 (I’m 26 now), and my wife has one to match. I bought a 32GB Wi-Fi iPad which I had delivered to my door on day one. After three months of regular use, I’ve decided to sell my iPad. While my decision to sell the iPad is a confluence of many factors, my recent two-week trip to California, on which I lugged my iPad around for the entire trip and didn’t use it, has convinced me of its un-usefullness.
MY SETUP
My main computer is the first 27-inch iMac, base model. I’ve got an iPhone 4, and my wife has a 2 year old 13-inch aluminum unibody MacBook, which I get to use most any time I need to. I bought the iPad with a few tasks in mind: I wanted to use it for casual browsing, Physics book reading, and viewing and storing pictures in the course of my work as a photographer.
SHORTCOMINGS OF THE IPAD
TABS
The single biggest feature missing from the iPad to make it a viable internet device in my life is a usable implementation of tabbed browsing. When I sit down to do some serious internet research, I break my process into two parts: searching and reading. During the searching phase, I perform searches. On an OS X machine, I use Google, Wikipedia, or eBay, whatever the tool at hand, to perform various searches. I quickly parse the results and Command-Click on the results of interest. On any desktop browser, this action loads the requested pages in the background, in background tabs. These tabs are then waiting for me when I’m done searching and I’m ready to read and assimilate the information I’m looking for (the reading phase). Sure, the iPad allows you to “Open Link in Window” by tapping-and-holding on the link, but this causes the link to open in the foreground and requires that you tap the window manager (invoking a cool, but slow, zoom transition) and then tap the original page to return to your search results (zoom animation again): Too many taps, and too much time.
The problem is further compounded by the iPad’s relatively limited amount of RAM. Even if you go through this open-in-new-window-switch-to-origninal-window fancy-zoomed dance, the windows that live in the background soon get dumped from memory and have to be reloaded when its time to use them. The result is a cumbersome experience impeded by extra taps and waiting. If you just read one website at a time and then go on to another, the iPad would likely be a good match for your uses, but for involved internet research, the iPad just doesn’t cut it.
KEYBOARD
I’m quite used to the touch keyboard on the iPhone. It’s great for what it is; I don’t use it for writing emails or long documents, but it gets the job done when it needs to. The iPad keyboard isn’t as good. The landscape orientation requires that you awkwardly balance the iPad on your lap when you touch type, and the portrait orientation is a little too big to comfortably thumb type. The result is two orientations which are both best suited to holding with one hand an one-finger typing with the other hand: slow and awkward. I’m an advocate of the touch screen keyboard, in general, but a split keyboard that facilitates thumb typing, would be a welcome improvement. The on screen keyboard in just another reason that I groan inside when I go to use the iPad.
KEYNOTE DISAPPOINTMENT
During Apple’s release of the iPad, they spent quite a bit of keynote time touting their new iWork apps for the iPad. In fact, this was one of the big draws for me in buying an iPad. I’m a graduate student working on my Ph.D. in chemical physics. One of the major ways that scientists share information with each other is through powerpoint-presentation fueled conferences. I’ve long loved keynote for making presentations, and I use almost everyone of its features.
Keynote for iPad cannot open Keynote for Mac files. Instead, it imports them into a special iPad-keynote file. This would be fine, except that the iPad doesn’t support many of the features of the Mac files. Most frustratingly, the iPad doesn’t support any sort of object groups, which play a major role in building clever animations and slides in Keynote. Yes, you export from Keynote for Mac into Quicktime and play that on the iPad, but animations render less smoothly, and the Quicktime Player affords less control than Keynote and doesn’t offer presenter view.
Not only is this an overall disappointment from the demo Apple offered, but it cost me $10. Thumbs down.
GOOD AS A READER, BUT LACKING SOFTWARE
The iPad’s killer app is reading. As an aspiring scientist, this is especially true of reading PDFs. As a student taking courses, the iPad has nearly all of my physics textbooks on it. It also is great for reading scientific papers. Having books and papers with you at all times makes you more likely to read them. Unfortunately, there isn’t a good library manager for PDFs on the iPad. Apple’s solution, iBooks, is beautiful and renders PDFs quickly, but is hampered by the lack of any sort of file management. Hello, Apple? Remember iTunes and the iPod? You wrote the book on making lumps of data easy and fun to access. Is pretty-fake-wood-bookshelf the best thing you can do for a pile of books? There’s no column-view, no browser, no search, no folders, no sorting options, just a big-ass-shelf. As far as keeping scientific papers organized, iBooks is totally useless. iBooks is further hampered by only offering two methods for adding PDFs to its library: a wired connection to iTunes or from email. There’s no option for saving PDFs off the web.
There are a few 3rd party solutions. The most popular (and cheapest) of these is Goodreader. Goodreader gives you a lot for the money, but has a bit of a “kitchen-sink” approach to their software, with every conceivable feature implemented, often poorly. Goodreader supports a weird little file system, with folders for keeping things organized. You can get files into Goodreader from an amazing number of sources. It connects to the web, email, dropbox, FTP servers (AFP is notably missing), you can connect over bluetooth or via WiFi. But, Goodreader is buggy and often slow. It had very awkward navigation controls until its most recent update. It doesn’t support true PDF page numbers; there’s no page thumbnails; it doesn’t seem to support links or navigation within the PDF. Overall I’d give Goodreader a thumbs up, since it makes the iPad a viable reader for science and textbooks, but it’s laking some features and stability to make it shine.
In the end, its the iPad’s capabilities as a book reader is what I like most. As I’ve weighed the option of selling my iPad it has been its capabilities as a book reader that I’ve compared against the notion of cash in my pocket. But, at $600 it’s just too much reader for my budget.
SYNCING
The abysmal syncing situation on the iPad has been written about before. In short, there is no file syncing on the iPad. The iPad is about as smart as a floppy drive when it comes to moving files on and off. For maintaining a large PDF library of scientific papers this is particularly cumbersome. Mendelely promises to support the iPad sometime soon, but in the meantime its full manual library management.
An aside, Apple should buy Dropbox. Apple has had a long time to demonstrate that they suck at online services. Dropbox is flat-out awesome, supports over the air syncing for Mac, Windows and Linux and they have clients for iPad and iPhone. I use Dropbox everyday and I love it. Just the fact that Dropbox is the best online service out there that Google doesn’t own, is reason enough for Apple to buy it. It would be a great cornerstone to the MobileMe suite, and worth paying for extra space. Apple: save MobileMe by buying Dropbox.
IPHONE CANNIBAL
The nail in the coffin for the iPad in my life was my new iPhone 4. Between the retina display, iOS 4, FaceTime, and the more responsive hardware (thanks in part to more RAM) the current iPad seems sluggish and behind the times. I’m sure Apple will address all of these issues and perhaps more in the next release of the iPad, but for the time being it makes the iPad seem even more like a $600 toy. Product cannibalism is a term that pundits and analysts often toss around, and this is the first time I’ve personally encountered it. The iPhone 4 is so good (take that, antenna critics) that it makes my almost-new iPad seem obsolete.
WHAT THIS DOESN’T MEAN
The iPad isn’t doomed. I’m a power user, admittedly. Even so, the iPad does have a spot in my life for reading and photos, but not a $600 spot. For the non-power users out there the iPad is great. I convinced my 89 year-old grandmother to buy one, and its working out really well for her. Similarly, my non-iPhone using scientist friends seems to like their iPads too. I still think the iPad is great for a majority of users and would still encourage them to get one (Anna, Blaine and Grandpa C I’m looking at you). But for me in my three months on use, the expense didn’t outweigh its benefits.